Table of Contents
Vulnerability lists dominate security programs, but breaches keep happening because exposure isn’t just bugs, it’s misconfigured controls, shadow IT, and coverage gaps that traditional scanning can’t see. Organizations that shift to continuous threat exposure management (CTEM) and focus on what exposures are relevant to their environment cut successful attacks in half by finally closing the boring gaps that matter.
Everyone Knows They’re Exposed, However Breaches Still Land
Most security programs can produce lists of “critical” CVEs, track patching efforts via dashboards, and generate board reporting to reflect progress. The metrics look good. The compliance scores are high. Auditors are happy.
Then the breach happens anyway.
Why? Because complexity itself became part of the attack surface. The average company runs 60–70 security tools across more than a dozen vendors, yet still can’t answer the simple question: “Am I secure, and where are the real risky exposures?” Into that gap of overlapping consoles and disjoint priorities slip the unglamorous oversights attackers love.
Take Snowflake’s 2024 customer breaches. Attackers didn’t exploit a new zero-day, they used previously stolen credentials and targeted accounts with weak or missing MFA. Because many organizations did not rotate passwords or enforced MFA, valid logins remained viable. Once inside, the attackers exfiltrated sensitive data from hundreds of customer environments and extorted victims. This is a prime example of a configuration and control failure, not a scanning failure.
Another vivid example: the Scattered Spider campaigns in the UK (2024–2025). Rather than smashing through code, the threat actors leaned on social engineering, impersonation of IT helpdesks, and MFA fatigue attacks, tricking support staff into resetting passwords or granting access. After gaining footholds, they pivoted into cloud systems, including Snowflake instances, to harvest data and deploy ransomware. The attacks hit major UK retailers like Marks & Spencer, Co-op, and Harrods, causing operational disruption, payment issues, and massive fallout. Along the way, these attackers exploited the weakest links in enterprise environments: human trust, vendor relationships, and control enforcement.
These weren’t scanning misses. They were coverage gaps, human-control failures, misconfigurations, and exposure in the seams. Traditional vulnerability dashboards don’t surface because most tools don’t see through human trust, mis-provisioned access, or chained interactions between identity, cloud, vendor, and network.
Even Gartner is calling it out. Their 2025 report Use Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) to Reduce Cyberattacks warns that vulnerability-only programs still churn out “rarely actioned reports and long lists of generic remediations” that don’t actually shrink the attack surface. The reports exist, but they’re not addressing real risk.
The Problem: Exposure Got Flattened Into “Bug”
Somewhere along the way, “exposure” became synonymous with “CVE.” It’s understandable why: CVEs are concrete, they have scores, they fit nicely into spreadsheets. They make great metrics for quarterly review, and are heavily regulated from a compliance standpoint.
They’re also completely insufficient for understanding real risk.
True exposure lives in all the messy, complicated conditions that attackers actually exploit:
- Controls that exist in architecture diagrams but aren’t enforced in production
- Assets security tools lost track of three migrations ago
- Configurations that were right once but have been quietly degrading
- Vulnerabilities that are technically present but realistically reachable
- Threat activity that’s shaping what attackers are going after right now
Reducing everything to CVEs creates a false sense of safety. Which is especially problematic when you consider that basic cyber hygiene, properly configuring and enforcing what’s already deployed, could prevent 99% of breaches. The challenge isn’t scanning. It’s implementation.
What Actually Works: Starting With What Matters
If vulnerability lists aren’t enough, what replaces them? Not more scanning. Not another dashboard. A completely different way to look at the problem.
A stronger approach starts at the asset level and works outward. Ask the fundamental questions first:
- What is this asset?
- Why does it matter to the business?
Then get specific:
- Is it actually protected, or just theoretically protected?
- Are the controls you think are running actually deployed and enforced?
- Which weaknesses are reachable in that live state?
- Is it a VIP asset or a server with access to nothing?
This means thinking like an attacker instead of like a compliance checklist.
Seen this way, exposure stops being a raw inventory of every possible issue and becomes a map of actual attacker paths, the difference between 10,000 findings and the 10 that matter.
CTEM: Making This Actually Happen
That layered thinking is what underpins CTEM. Instead of treating exposure as a static, vulnerability-driven snapshot, CTEM makes it a living cycle: scope what actually matters to your business, discover weaknesses across both assets and controls, validate which ones can genuinely be exploited, and mobilize fixes across teams who can actually do something about them.
It’s not another data feed. It’s a fundamental shift from counting weaknesses to systematically closing them.
The impact is measurable. Gartner forecasts that organizations adopting CTEM and mobilizing it across business units will cut successful cyberattacks by at least 50% by 2028. Not by patching faster but by focusing on what adversaries can actually reach.
The Attack Window Keeps Shrinking
This shift isn’t just a smart strategy, it’s survival. You won’t always have the luxury of patching in time. With AI driving attacks at machine speed, survival could depend on making sure your defenses are already hardened and controls are firing on all cylinders—before the first exploit even lands. According to Adam Meyers, VP Counter Adversary at CrowdStrike, the fastest recorded lateral movement breakout time is 51 seconds from initial compromise to penetrating another system. Fifty-one seconds. AI-driven attacks now complete full kill chains, reconnaissance, initial access, lateral movement, data exfiltration in as little as 10 minutes.
Quarterly patch backlogs can’t compete with that. While cybersecurity teams employ AI-powered defenses, attackers are using AI to automate and scale operations thousands of times faster than any human defender. The time to detect, analyze, and counter threats has never been more compressed, and periodic assessment approaches are falling dangerously behind adversary tempo.
So What Now
Stop measuring exposure as a body count of bugs. Start measuring it as the set of conditions attackers can actually exploit in your environment.
Organizations that make this shift, asset-first, control-first, threat-informed see real impact: 95% of critical exposures eliminated in weeks, remediation cycles 45% faster, massive efficiency gains as duplicate tools and manual processes get cut. Basic hygiene alone could stop 98% of breaches, but most organizations are still working through siloed data and alert fatigue.
Gartner’s forecast is clear: exposure management done right doesn’t just clean up dashboards. It cuts breach risk in half.
That’s the difference between looking busy and actually being secure.
Ready to See How?
See what a layered, control-first approach to exposure management looks like in practice.
Schedule a demo and learn how to move from dashboards to actual risk reduction, or register for our upcoming Webinar “A New Lens on Exposure: From Fragmented Findings to Focused Defense” next Wednesday October 8th
