back to blog

BLOG OCT 7 2025

Monitoring Version Compliance Across the Entire Attack Surface

Alma Vilcov

Version compliance isn’t a maintenance chore, it’s a core security control. Outdated software opens attack paths and creates audit risk, yet most enterprises can’t prove compliance across all systems. This guide breaks down why traditional patch tools fall short, how to set realistic version baselines, and how Nagomi turns scattered data into one defensible compliance view tied to real exposure reduction.
By Alma Vilcov – Senior Manager, Customer Success

Version compliance may sound like an operational detail, but it is one of the most important pillars of enterprise security. Outdated software consistently ranks as a leading security concern, providing adversaries with reliable routes into a network. At the same time, version tracking is a fundamental expectation in regulatory frameworks such as ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, and HIPAA. Auditors, customers, and regulators all expect clear evidence that systems are updated and compliant with organizational policy.

At scale, maintaining this assurance is far from simple. With thousands of servers and workstations spread across Windows, macOS, and Linux, manual tracking is infeasible. Security, IT, and compliance teams often lack a single source of truth, leaving organizations struggling to answer a basic question: Are we on the right version everywhere?

Why Version Compliance Matters

Beyond audit readiness, version compliance plays a direct role in reducing cyber risk. Unpatched or outdated systems are often the easiest paths for attackers to exploit, and misalignment with internal version policies can extend the attack surface in ways that are difficult to understand without proper visibility.

A defensible, enterprise-wide compliance process ensures that:

  • Known vulnerabilities are eliminated faster, reducing breach likelihood.
  • Audit evidence is consistent and reliable, streamlining regulatory reporting.
  • Security, IT, and compliance teams align on a unified set of metrics, rather than reconciling fragmented reports.

Reducing everything to CVEs creates a false sense of safety. Which is especially problematic when you consider that basic cyber hygiene, properly configuring and enforcing what’s already deployed, could prevent 99% of breaches. The challenge isn’t scanning. It’s implementation.

Reality Check: “Latest” Isn’t Always Practical

The ideal of running the latest software version across all assets is rarely practical. Mission-critical applications may not support the newest OS, legacy dependencies can break with rapid upgrades, and strict regulatory change-control processes or operational realities can often prevent immediate rollouts.

As a result, many enterprises adopt version baselines such as n-1 (one version behind) or other defined standards. These provide a balance between security, operational stability, and regulatory compliance. The real challenge lies not in setting the policy, but in monitoring, enforcing and demonstrating it at scale.

Limits of Traditional Tools

Enterprises commonly depend on platform-specific tools, such as SCCM for Windows, Jamf for Apple, and various patching tools for Linux. While effective at deploying updates, these systems are limited as compliance solutions:

  • Siloed coverage: Each tool tracks only its platform, requiring reconciliation across multiple systems.
  • Fragmented visibility: – Multiple dashboards and spreadsheets are required to piece together enterprise-wide reporting.
  • Operational orientation: Reporting focuses on patch job completion, not whether systems are compliant with security policy.
  • Poor scalability: Measuring compliance against multiple baselines (e.g., latest vs. n-1) quickly becomes unmanageable at enterprise scale.

This fragmented approach often leaves security leaders uncertain about true risk exposure, while IT teams remain focused only on operational success.

Where Nagomi can Help

Nagomi addresses these challenges by embedding version compliance into a broader exposure management program. Rather than treating it as an operational afterthought, version compliance becomes part of a unified, security first strategy with an executable outcome. Our Findings feature surfaces security issues by combining exposures such as misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and coverage gaps with critical asset attributes like version compliance. This approach provides teams with a prioritized, contextual view of risk that other, more fragmented tooling, cannot provide.

Key differentiators include:

  • KeyUnified dashboards across all platforms : Windows, macOS, Linux, servers, and workstations are normalized into a single compliance view.
  • Policy-flexible compliance: Organizations can define policies by latest, n-1, or any approved baseline, with clear reporting on assets that fall out of policy.
  • Security-first lensL Nagomi evaluates version gaps in the context of exposure, correlating outdated systems with live threats, control effectiveness, and business impact.
  • Enterprise scale normalization: Exposure Lens correlates data from thousands of assets into consistent, comparable metrics for operators, auditors, and executives alike.
  • Bridging IT and Security : IT teams continue to use SCCM, Jamf, or Linux tools for patching, while Nagomi validates compliance across all systems—removing silos and ensuring alignment.differentiators include:

Conclusion

Monitoring version compliance is no longer simply about patching; it is about proving control across the entire attack surface. Traditional tools provide fragmented, incomplete views that fall short of the unified, contextual perspective required to reduce risk and meet compliance demands.

Nagomi revolutionizes version compliance into an executable, measurable process. By unifying data, supporting flexible policies, and applying a security-first lens, organizations can monitor compliance across all systems, demonstrate control with confidence, and reduce the preventable risks that outdated versions introduce.

With this approach, compliance is no longer a burden—it becomes a measurable defense outcome.

See how to monitor version compliance and cut risk—book your demo today.

, ,